Session Fixation After WebAuthn Assertion
← Insecure Authentication / Authorization
passkey_session_fixation MEDIUM
| Category | Insecure Authentication / Authorization |
| OWASP Mobile (2024) | M3 |
| MASVS | MASVS-AUTH-3MASVS-AUTH-2 |
| MASWE | MASWE-0024 |
| CWE | CWE-384 |
| Platform | AndroidiOS |
Description
The session identifier is not rotated after a successful passkey assertion, so a pre-set (attacker-known) session id remains valid post-login (session fixation).
How it works
The session id set before login is kept unchanged after a successful passkey assertion. An attacker who planted that pre-auth id still knows it afterward, so their copy is now an authenticated session. A correct flow rotates the session id on authentication. Scope: the FIDO2 signature is assumed valid (signature verification is out of scope); the flaw demonstrated is in the relying-party authorization logic on top of it.
How to exercise it. DVMA is the harness - open this module from the home index and tap the demo action. The screen ships the malicious input and simulates the attacker (e.g. the companion app, crafted intent, or scanned payload) in-process, and the evidence panel prints the proof. The Tools (optional) and Attack inputs below are only needed to reproduce the exploit end-to-end on a real device.
Exploit steps
- Set up. Build DVMA with a flavor that enables the Insecure Authentication / Authorization category (e.g.
--dart-define-from-file=config/flavors/dev.json) and run on an emulator/simulator you control. The demo needs no external tooling; for the optional on-device reproduction the relevant tools are:webauthn test harness,Burp Suite,mitmproxy. - Locate the target. From the home index, open Session Fixation After WebAuthn Assertion (
passkey_session_fixation). The How it works section above describes this module’s specific weakness; the screen states the intended-secure behavior and exposes the vulnerable action. - Exploit. Drive the authentication/authorization path, capture the token / assertion / decision, then replay or tamper with it (mitmproxy, a WebAuthn test harness, or by editing the value) and confirm the server-side check accepts the manipulated request.
- Observe the evidence. Trigger the vulnerable action and read the evidence panel - it prints the concrete proof (leaked value, accepted replay, executed payload, or unauthorized result).
- Contrast with the secure path. Run the module’s secure/hardened action (where provided) and confirm the same attack is rejected - this is what a correct implementation should do.
Tools (optional)
Real-world references
Concrete public disclosures that match this vulnerability class: