Intent Redirection / Task Hijack (StrandHogg-style)
intent_redirection HARD
| Category | Improper Platform Usage |
| OWASP Mobile (2024) | M4 |
| MASVS | MASVS-PLATFORM-1 |
| MASWE | MASWE-0032 |
| MASTG (v2 tests) | iOSNoneAndroidMASTG-TEST-0375 |
| CWE | CWE-926CWE-940 |
| Platform | Android |
Description
An exported component forwards an attacker-supplied nested intent to an internal component (intent redirection), and lax task affinity enables task hijack.
How it works
An exported component extracts a nested “forward” intent from attacker-supplied extras and dispatches it with no target validation, letting an external caller reach an internal-only component through the app’s own privileges. This is a Dart simulation; the real exploit is Android-level, an exported Activity forwarding a parcelled “intent” extra.
How to exercise it. DVMA is the harness - open this module from the home index and tap the demo action. The screen ships the malicious input and simulates the attacker (e.g. the companion app, crafted intent, or scanned payload) in-process, and the evidence panel prints the proof. The Tools (optional) and Attack inputs below are only needed to reproduce the exploit end-to-end on a real device.
Exploit steps
- Set up. Build DVMA with a flavor that enables the Improper Platform Usage category (e.g.
--dart-define-from-file=config/flavors/dev.json) and run on an Android emulator you control. The demo needs no external tooling; for the optional on-device reproduction the relevant tools are:adb,drozer,jadx. - Locate the target. From the home index, open Intent Redirection / Task Hijack (StrandHogg-style) (
intent_redirection). The How it works section above describes this module’s specific weakness; the screen states the intended-secure behavior and exposes the vulnerable action. - Exploit. From a co-resident/attacker context (
adb shell am start/drozer, or a crafted deep link / QR), send the untrusted input to the exported component or WebView and confirm the app performs the unsafe action (navigation, JS execution, file/URI access) with no validation. - Observe the evidence. Trigger the vulnerable action and read the evidence panel - it prints the concrete proof (leaked value, accepted replay, executed payload, or unauthorized result).
- Contrast with the secure path. Run the module’s secure/hardened action (where provided) and confirm the same attack is rejected - this is what a correct implementation should do.
- Map it back. Cross-reference the MASTG v2 test(s) MASTG-TEST-0375 for the canonical procedure and remediation.
Tools (optional)
Attack inputs
Payloads/artifacts you author for the on-device attack. The demo already ships and simulates these in-process (e.g. the malicious companion app / crafted intent is emulated inside the screen), so you only need to craft them to reproduce the exploit on a real device:
malicious companion app